Point-in-time forecasting · 2026 season, run live

104 matches. Forecast before kickoff. Scored after.

A Bayesian scoreline model that published a probability for every match of the 2026 World Cup before it was played — and publishes the scorecard, including the parts that were only average.

FIG. 01 Headline calls

Champion called Spain

its co-favorite throughout; a 50.7% / 49.3% call in the final itself

Both finalists Spain · Argentina

its top two in title probabilities from the group stage onward

All four semifinalists 4 / 4

inside its projected quarterfinal eight, published before the Round of 32 finished

Most likely final score 0–0

13.9% — the single most likely scoreline; Spain won in extra time

FIG. 02 The record

The record

Modal-outcome hits are against the model's own 1X2 pick. Point-in-time: each match priced by a model that had seen only earlier results.

Match record by stage. Modal-outcome hits are against the model's own 1X2 pick. Each match was priced point-in-time using only earlier results.
Stage Matches Mean RPS Modal hits
Group 72 0.157 46 / 72
Round of 32 16 0.116 12 / 16
Round of 16 8 0.188 6 / 8
Quarter-finals 4 0.134 4 / 4
Semi-finals 2 0.196 2 / 2
Third place 1 0.333 0 / 1
Final 1 0.271 1 / 1
All knockout 32 0.153 25 / 32

Knockout ties by which team advanced: 26 of 32 (81%). Quarter-finals onward: 7 of 7.

FIG. 03 Calibration

Calibration

Favorites: predicted 69.7%, realized 76.8%

across 56 favorite-band matches — calibrated, with the error on the humble side

Draw rate: predicted 23.4%, realized 23.1%

Goal-margin tails within ~1.5 points at every threshold

≥2 goals: 42.8% predicted / 43.3% real · ≥3: 21.5 / 21.2 · ≥4: 10.2 / 8.7

DISCLOSURE — not a figure

What it didn't do

Over the full 104-match replay, the model and a plain Elo baseline are statistically tied — 0.1561 against 0.1557. It was ahead through the group stage as played live (0.157 against 0.163), and the two converged across the knockouts. Both numbers are published because a forecaster that only reports its good window is not a forecaster.

It has no demonstrated edge against sharp betting markets. An early audit called that a tie; a later preregistered test on 217 fixtures put the market ahead of the model by about 0.010 in mean RPS, and the honest reading is that the market forecast better. The full account is here. Nothing on this site is betting advice, and nothing on it is sold as one.

FIG. 04 For publishers

For publishers

An embeddable forecast surface for your football coverage — probabilities, not picks.

Two tiers — the tournament ladder and schedule, or the full per-fixture detail. Availability by tournament window.

Enquire about a tournament window